BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. May 24, 2026; 17(5): 120600
Published online May 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i5.120600
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plots showing the comparative diagnostic performance (pooled odds ratio) of intracystic glucose vs carcinoembryonic antigen. A: Accuracy, with pooled odds ratio (OR): 3.35 (95%CI: 2.34-4.80, I² = 92.87%); B: Sensitivity, with pooled OR: 9.36 (95%CI: 6.72-13.06, I² = 0%); C: Specificity, with pooled OR: 0.43 (95%CI: 0.26-0.70, I² = 0%). CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.


Write to the Help Desk