BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2026; 17(4): 117460
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.117460
Table 4 Qualitative assessment of clinical and methodological heterogeneity across included studies
Ref.
Cancer type
Neurotoxic agent
Study design
CIPN definition/grading
Sample source
miRNA platform
Timing of sampling
Key source of heterogeneity
Davey et al[36], 2023Breast cancerPaclitaxelProspective cohortNCI-CTCAE (grade not stratified)Whole bloodqRT-PCR (predefined panel)During chemotherapyWhole blood vs plasma/serum; limited miRNA panel
Ju et al[37], 2022Gastric cancerOxaliplatin (XELOX)Prospective cohortNCI-CTCAE; cycle-based severityPlasmaSmall RNA sequencing + qRT-PCR validationAfter < 4 vs ≥ 4 cyclesCycle-based CIPN definition; sequencing-based discovery
Ju et al[38], 2024Colorectal cancerOxaliplatin (FOLFOX)Prospective cohortNCI-CTCAE; ≤ 3 vs ≥ 6 cyclesPlasmaRNA sequencing + qRT-PCR validationEarly vs late chemotherapy exposureDose/cycle-based stratification; stress biomarker integration
Łuczkowska et al[39], 2021Multiple myelomaBortezomib-based regimensCase-controlNCI-CTCAE (IMWG-adapted)PlasmaMicroarray + qRT-PCR validationDuring treatmentDifferent malignancy and neurotoxicity mechanism
Noda-Narita et al[40], 2020Breast cancerPaclitaxelRetrospective cohortNCI-CTCAE ≥ grade 2 vs ≤ 1SerumMicroarrayPre-treatmentDifferent grade threshold and retrospective design


Write to the Help Desk