Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Mar 24, 2026; 17(3): 115774
Published online Mar 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i3.115774
Published online Mar 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i3.115774
Table 3 Linear regression of image-guided radiation therapy characteristics and patient-reported outcomes in intensity-modulated radiotherapy cohort (n = 106), n (%)/mean (SD or SE)
| EPIC urinary incontinence | P value | EPIC urinary irritative/obstructive | P value | EPIC bowel summary | P value | EPIC sexual summary | P value | SF-36 physical component summary | P value | SF-36 mental component summary | P value | |
| Intercept | -22.4 (28.6) | 0.436 | 34.0 (29.4) | 0.250 | 92.2 (36.8) | 0.014 | 45.8 (45.9) | 0.320 | 17.2 (11.5) | 0.139 | 36.8 (12.7) | 0.005 |
| Pre-treatment score | 0.6 (0.1) | < 0.001 | 0.4 (0.1) | < 0.001 | 0.0 (0.2) | 0.952 | 0.5 (0.1) | < 0.001 | 0.4 (0.1) | < 0.001 | 0.3 (0.1) | 0.001 |
| CBCT+ planning target volume margins combined | ||||||||||||
| No CBCT; > 5 mm | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| CBCT; 5 mm or less | 14.4 (7.2) | 0.048 | 2.6 (7.3) | 0.720 | -9.9 (6.3) | 0.122 | 0.1 (11.0) | 0.989 | -3.3 (2.7) | 0.217 | 2.2 (3.3) | 0.503 |
| CBCT; > 5 mm | -2.2 (6.0) | 0.709 | -4.3 (6.2) | 0.489 | -8.1 (5.3) | 0.133 | 2.2 (9.3) | 0.817 | -1.7 (2.3) | 0.464 | -1.1 (2.7) | 0.680 |
| Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions | ||||||||||||
| ≤ 78 | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| > 78 | -8.4 (5.2) | 0.113 | -15.2 (5.4) | 0.006 | -3.2 (4.7) | 0.494 | -5.8 (8.0) | 0.471 | -2.4 (2.1) | 0.256 | 0.0 (2.4) | 0.993 |
| Dose per fraction | ||||||||||||
| < 3 Gy/fraction | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| ≥ 3 Gy/fraction | -13.6 (6.2) | 0.030 | -11.1 (6.1) | 0.075 | 3.5 (5.2) | 0.504 | -2.4 (9.0) | 0.794 | 4.0 (2.2) | 0.070 | -3.1 (2.7) | 0.253 |
| Risk | ||||||||||||
| Low | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Intermediate | -1.2 (5.5) | 0.823 | 3.4 (5.7) | 0.550 | 3.5 (4.9) | 0.479 | 4.4 (8.5) | 0.604 | 3.0 (2.1) | 0.148 | 0.4 (2.5) | 0.865 |
| Age | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.031 | 0.4 (0.4) | 0.334 | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.818 | -0.4 (0.6) | 0.542 | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.464 | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.752 |
- Citation: Mera A, Sancho G, Garin O, Pont À, Pardo Y, Macias V, Hervas A, Cabrera P, Ferrer F, Roselló À, Samper Ots P, García ME, Jové-Teixidó J, Ferrer M, The Multicentric Spanish Group of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Patient-reported outcome measures for technology assessment: A comparison between three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in prostate cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(3): 115774
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i3/115774.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v17.i3.115774