Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Mar 24, 2026; 17(3): 113226
Published online Mar 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i3.113226
Published online Mar 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i3.113226
Table 2 Current and potential patient-focused artificial intelligence applications and validation gaps in interventional oncology
| Application | Description | Highest level of clinical evidence currently available | Most significant validation gap | Ref. |
| Patient selection & response prediction | Analyzes clinical data to predict therapeutic response, enabling patient-specific treatment recommendations while accounting for potential risks | Retrospective studies, simulation platforms, some prospective modeling | Lack of prospective trials and integration into real-time clinical decision-making | [41,54,55,60-63,67,111,115] |
| Patient triage | Prioritizes patients for urgent interventional oncology procedures by evaluating imaging and clinical indicators of disease severity | Retrospective validation in diagnostic settings | Limited IO-specific validation and real-time deployment in procedural prioritization | [128] |
| Personalized post-procedural follow-up and long-term management | Integrates clinical, procedural, and imaging data to customize follow-up schedules and management plans, improving patient outcomes over time | Retrospective studies, mobile health feasibility trials | Lack of prospective trials with integration with EMRs and imaging systems | [23,111-113,115,116,129,130] |
| Improved patient experience | Delivers personalized education, procedural tours, and recovery support to foster a more comfortable and informed perioperative experience | Feasibility studies and pilot implementations, RCT | Limited usability testing and lack of standardized patient outcome metrics | [129,133,134] |
| Comprehension enhancement | Provides clear, individualized instructions, interactive virtual tours, and tailored recovery feedback to improve patient understanding and adherence | Systematic reviews and NLP-based readability studies | Lack of prospective validation and integration into clinical education workflows | [129,131-134] |
- Citation: Almashni SY, Fayek FB, Javens DC, Boulis MT, Makary MS. Evolving and novel applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(3): 113226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i3/113226.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v17.i3.113226