BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 126647
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.126647
Figure 1
Figure 1 Comparison of the immunophenotype and components between resident myelodysplastic syndrome natural killers and resident healthy donor natural killers. A and B: Representative flow cytometry diagrams (A) and statistical analysis (B) of CD3-CD56+ total natural killers (NK) cells in the indicated groups [resident myelodysplastic syndrome NKs (rMDS-NKs), resident healthy donor NKs (rHD-NKs)]; C and D: Representative flow cytometry diagrams (C) and statistical analyses (D) of total activated CD3-CD56+CD16+ NK cells and the indicated subsets (NKG2D+, CD25+, NKp44+, and NKp46+) in the indicated groups (rMDS-NKs, rHD-NKs); E: Statistical analyses of CD3+ total T lymphocytes, CD3+CD56+ NKT cells, and the T cell subsets (CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, and CD4+FoxP3+ T cells) in the indicated groups (rMDS-NKs, rHD-NKs). Data were shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 repetitions for each sample). aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01, NS: Not significant. rMDS-NKs: Resident myelodysplastic syndrome natural killers; rHD-NKs: Resident healthy donor natural killers; NK: Natural killer.


Write to the Help Desk