Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 125846
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.125846
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.125846
Figure 3 Biomarker-guided vitamin strategies for immune reprogramming in cancer immunotherapy.
This schematic summarizes a hypothetical conceptual precision framework for integrating vitamin-derived interventions into cancer immunotherapy. It is not a ready-to-use clinical decision-making algorithm. Rather than treating vitamins as empirical supplements, the workflow links defined biomarkers to mechanistically matched immune-reprogramming strategies and measurable therapeutic outputs. Among biomarkers shown in the left panel: Only serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D represents a clinically available nutritional status marker. All other biomarkers [glucose transporter 1/dehydroascorbic acid transport, SVCT expression, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 vitcylation, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)1A2/ALDH1A3-retinoic acid receptor signaling, scavenger receptor class B member 1-Src-homology-2-domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP1) signaling, natural killer (NK)-cell metabolic fitness] are exploratory tier 1 pre-clinical candidates without prospective human clinical validation. The central panel illustrates corresponding interventions: Vitamin D3 repletion during immune checkpoint blockade, pharmacological ascorbate to enhance tumor immunogenicity and anti-programmed cell death 1 responsiveness, vitamin E-mediated dendritic cell reinvigoration through SHP1 inhibition, retinoic-acid-pathway blockade or activation to remodel tolerance, all-trans retinoic acid-mediated differentiation of suppressive myeloid cells, and nicotinamide-based NK-cell manufacturing. Most of these intervention-biomarker pairings are derived from pre-clinical mechanistic studies. Only nicotinamide-based ex vivo NK-cell manufacturing has preliminary clinical supporting evidence. The right panel defines the immune and clinical outputs that should be prospectively measured in future investigations, including antigen presentation, dendritic-cell cross-presentation, macrophage phagocytosis and interleukin-12 signaling, NK-cell persistence and cytotoxicity, CD8+ T-cell infiltration and effector function, reversal of exhaustion, response durability, and immune-related toxicity. The central message is that vitamin-mediated immune reprogramming requires biomarker validation, exposure control, immune-compartment definition, and prospective randomized clinical trials before any real-world clinical adoption. Notably, this diagram serves solely as a hypothesis-generating conceptual framework; most candidate biomarkers and intervention matching strategies remain preclinically exploratory without prospective clinical validation, and cannot be directly applied as a decision-making tool for routine clinical practice. 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; PD-1: Programmed cell death 1; ATRA: All-trans retinoic acid; MDSC: Myeloid-derived suppressor cell; RA: Retinoic acid; SHP1: Src-homology-2-domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1; DC: Dendritic cell; IFN-γ: Interferon gamma; STAT1: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; MHC: Major histocompatibility complex; IL-12: Interleukin-12; TME: Tumor microenvironment; NK: Natural killer; IV: Intravenous; ICI: Immune checkpoint inhibitor.
- Citation: Zhang Q, Yang RH, An XR, Chang HC. Vitamin-mediated cancer immune reprogramming: Context-dependent mechanisms and translational perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 125846
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i10/125846.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.125846