Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Figure 3 Network meta-analysis of conservative treatments for complete response rates in patients with atypical polypoid adenomyoma.
A: Network structure showing treatment groups, with circle size indicating patient numbers and line thickness representing study comparisons; B: Rankings of interventions based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis; C: Forest plot of achieving complete response for each treatment compared to transcervical resection of polyps; D: Net league diagram comparing treatment effectiveness. TCRP: Transcervical resection of polyps; LNG-IUS: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; COC: Combined oral contraceptive; PT: Progesterone therapy; MPA: Medroxyprogesterone acetate; TCRE: Transcervical resection of endometrium; PWH: Polyp resection without hysteroscopy; HDP: High-dose progestin; MT: Hormone maintenance therapy; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
- Citation: Huang JZ, Liu X, Deng YW, Wei CN, Tang SL, Zhi ZF. Endometrial polypoid adenomyoma outcomes and fertility-sparing treatments efficacy for atypical type: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 123273
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i10/123273.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.123273