Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Table 3 Rankings of interventions based on their ability to suppress endometrial cancer as indicated by surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis
| Treatment | SUCRA (%) | PrBest (%) | Mean rank |
| TCRP | 47.1 | 15.8 | 7.7 |
| TCRP + HDP | 73.1 | 11.9 | 4.2 |
| TCRP + COC | 46.8 | 8 | 7.4 |
| TCRP + LNG-IUS | 47.5 | 10.9 | 7.3 |
| TCRP + PT | 55.6 | 8 | 6.3 |
| TCRP + GnRH-a | 38.4 | 8.7 | 8.4 |
| TCRE | 51 | 6.2 | 6.9 |
| TCRE + PT | 53.6 | 5.6 | 6.6 |
| PWH + HDP | 45.9 | 4.6 | 7.5 |
| PWH + HDP + MT | 57.8 | 5.9 | 6.1 |
| PWH | 54 | 10.2 | 6.5 |
| LNG-IUS | 39.8 | 3.6 | 8.2 |
| PT | 46.9 | 0.6 | 7.4 |
- Citation: Huang JZ, Liu X, Deng YW, Wei CN, Tang SL, Zhi ZF. Endometrial polypoid adenomyoma outcomes and fertility-sparing treatments efficacy for atypical type: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 123273
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i10/123273.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.123273