Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Table 2 Rankings of interventions based on their ability to inhibit recurrence as indicated by surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis
| Treatment | SUCRA (%) | PrBest (%) | Mean rank |
| TCRP | 45.3 | 2 | 7 |
| TCRP + HDP | 60.3 | 0 | 5.4 |
| TCRP + MPA (10 mg/day) | 65.3 | 0.2 | 4.8 |
| TCRP + COC | 47.4 | 4.8 | 6.8 |
| TCRP + LNG-IUS | 47.6 | 4.6 | 6.8 |
| TCRP + GnRH-a | 55.3 | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| TCRP + PT | 50.1 | 0.6 | 6.5 |
| TCRE | 53.9 | 22.8 | 6.1 |
| TCRE + PT | 58.2 | 17.1 | 5.6 |
| PWH + HDP | 43.2 | 17 | 7.3 |
| PWH + HDP + MT | 59.3 | 16.2 | 5.5 |
| PWH | 30.4 | 12.6 | 8.7 |
- Citation: Huang JZ, Liu X, Deng YW, Wei CN, Tang SL, Zhi ZF. Endometrial polypoid adenomyoma outcomes and fertility-sparing treatments efficacy for atypical type: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 123273
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i10/123273.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.123273