Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123273
Table 1 Rankings of interventions based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis
| Treatment | SUCRA (%) | PrBest (%) | Mean rank |
| TCRP | 40.9 | 16.8 | 8.3 |
| TCRP + HDP | 49.9 | 15.8 | 7 |
| TCRP + MPA (10 mg/day) | 78.3 | 5.7 | 3.6 |
| TCRP + COC | 56.1 | 10 | 6.3 |
| TCRP + LNG-IUS | 66 | 14.7 | 5.1 |
| TCRP + PT | 42.3 | 10.3 | 7.9 |
| TCRE | 54.3 | 1.1 | 6.5 |
| TCRE + PT | 51.3 | 4.1 | 6.9 |
| PWH | 38.2 | 2.6 | 8.4 |
| PWH + HDP | 50.2 | 1 | 7 |
| PWH + HDP + MT | 49 | 3.8 | 7.1 |
| LNG-IUS | 40.3 | 10.1 | 8.2 |
| PT | 43.1 | 4 | 7.8 |
- Citation: Huang JZ, Liu X, Deng YW, Wei CN, Tang SL, Zhi ZF. Endometrial polypoid adenomyoma outcomes and fertility-sparing treatments efficacy for atypical type: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 123273
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i10/123273.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.123273