BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jan 24, 2026; 17(1): 114369
Published online Jan 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i1.114369
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of urinary dysfunction
Variables

Univariable
Multivariable
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Sex; femaleYes0.800 (0.227-2.820 0.728
Age ≥ 40 (year)Yes0.964 (0.284-3.270)0.953
BMI ≥ 25 (kg/m2)Yes0.221 (0.044-1.101)0.065
HypertensionYes0.303 (0.035-2.592)0.276
Diabetes mellitusYes2.301 (0.558-7.388)0.282
History of abdominal surgeryYes1.364 (0.242-7.698)0.725
Maximum tumor diameter ≥ 10 (cm)Yes3.750 (0.922-15.245) 0.065a9.622 (1.694-54.663)0.011a
Altman’ classificationIII/IV vs I-II5.946 (1.575-22.454) 0.009a13.264 (2.581-68.168)0.002a
Surgical approachType A1.000
Type B0.253 (0.048-1.319)0.103
Type C0.333 (0.076-1.458)0.144
Sacrococcygeal resectionYes0.731 (0.207-2.590)0.628
Intraoperative blood loss ≥ 400 (mL)Yes1.673 (0.286-9.789)0.568


Write to the Help Desk