BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jan 24, 2026; 17(1): 111294
Published online Jan 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i1.111294
Table 2 Summary of nanoparticle designs showing size, surface charge, functional modifications, and their application in targeting key immunosuppressive immune cells such as tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and dendritic cells within the tumor microenvironment
Nanoparticle type
Size (nm)
Surface charge
Surface modification
Payload
Target immune cell (s)
Key effect
Ref.
Polymeric nanocluster (SPN-R848)Approximately 100Slightly positivepH-responsive polymer shellTLR7/8 agonist (R848)TAMs, DCsPolarizes M2 TAMs to M1, activates DCs[49]
Lipid-coated CaCO3 NPs (CaGlu)Approximately 150Neutralβ-glucan surfaceCalcium carbonate + β-glucanTAMs, TregsRepolarizes TAMs, suppresses Tregs[50]
Biomimetic dendritic cell-like NPApproximately 120Near neutralDecorated with anti CD3/CD28/PD-1Immunomodulatory antibodiesDCs, T cellsActivates DCs, enhances T cell priming[56]
Iron oxide NPApproximately 50PositiveMannose ligandIron coreTAMsPromotes M1 polarization via ROS generation[47]
Liposome-based RNAi NPApproximately 90Slightly negativePEGylation, targeting peptidesiRNA targeting IDO/TGF-βMDSCs, TregsSuppresses immunosuppressive pathways[51]


Write to the Help Desk