BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2025; 16(9): 109182
Published online Sep 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.109182
Table 2 Clinicopathological comparisons between the two groups based on microsatellite status determined by immunohistochemistry results, n (%)
Descriptive and clinical features
Microsatellite instabil
Microsatellite stabile
P value
Age group, median (IQR)42 (7)46 (10)0.0351
21-300 (0)5 (5)
31-4014 (46.7)29 (29)
41-5016 (53.3)66 (66)
Sex
Male21 (70)48 (48)0.0342
Female9 (30)52 (52)
Survey (month), median (IQR)52 (42.5)38 (45)0.0201
Right colon and transvers colon
Negative10 (31.2)71 (69.6)< 0.0012
Positive22 (68.7)31 (30.3)
Rectosigmoid colon and rectum
Negative29 (90.6)69 (67.6)0.0112
Positive3 (9.3)33 (29.4)
Musinous component in the tumor
Negative15 (50)77 (77)0.0042
Positive15 (50)23 (23)
LN metastasis
Negative22 (73.3)51 (51)0.0312
Positive8 (26.7)49 (49)
Number of positive LNs, median (IQR)0 (1)0 (3)0.0311
T stage-
T10 (0)1 (1)
T22 (6.7)7 (7)
T321 (70)60 (60)
T4a ve T4b7 (23.3)32 (32)
N stage-
N021 (70)42 (42)
N1a, N1b ve N1c6 (20)34 (34)
N2a ve N2b3 (10)24 (24)
Metastasis
Negative28 (93.3)70 (70)0.0092
Positive2 (6.7)30 (30)
Stage0.0122
12 (6.7)6 (6)
218 (60)30 (30)
38 (26.7)35 (35)
42 (6.7)29 (29)
2nd tumor
Negative23 (76.7)96 (96)0.0033
Positive7 (23.3)4 (4)
Next-Generation Sequencing status< 0.0013
Mutasyon positive13 (76.5)1 (2.7)
Mutasyon negative4 (23.5)35 (97.3)


Write to the Help Desk