©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2025; 16(6): 107255
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.107255
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.107255
Table 2 Treatment regimens and hepatic tumor response, n (%)
| Variable | Patients (n = 28) |
| Anti-PD-antibody treatment cycle, median (IQR) | 1 (1-1) |
| Number of TACE treatments, median (IQR) | 4 (3-5.75) |
| Anti-PD-1 antibody class | |
| Tislelizumab | 6 (21.4) |
| Sintilimab | 12 (42.9) |
| Camrelizumab | 7 (25.0) |
| Pembrolizumab | 3 (10.7) |
| TKI class | |
| Lenvatinib | 19 (67.9) |
| Donafenib | 5 (17.9) |
| Apatinib | 3 (10.7) |
| Sorafenib | 1 (3.6) |
| Optimal tumor response according to mRECIST | |
| PR | 14 (50.0) |
| CR | 14 (50.0) |
- Citation: Zhang SB, Nashan B, Wang YL, Zhang SG. Efficacy of salvage surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma following conversion therapy. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(6): 107255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i6/107255.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.107255