Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2025; 16(6): 104299
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.104299
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.104299
Table 2 Some methodologies of Bayesian network inference
Algorithm | Network type | Complexity | Accuracy | Advantages | Ref. |
Variable elimination | Single, multi-connected networks | Exponential in the number of variables in factorization | Exact | Simple, easy to use | [22] |
Junction tree | Single, multi-connected networks | Exponential in the size of the largest clique | Exact | Fastest method, suitable for sparse networks | [22] |
Differential method | Single, multi-connected networks | Proportional to the complexity of differentiation operations | Exact | Can solve multiple problems simultaneously | [23] |
Stochastic sampling | Single, multi-connected networks | Inversely proportional to the probability of evidence variables | Approximate | Simple, widely applicable, and generally effective | [24] |
Loopy belief propagation | Single, multi-connected networks | Exponential in the number of loops in the network | Approximate | Performs well when the algorithm converges | [25] |
- Citation: Zhang MN, Xue MJ, Zhou BZ, Xu J, Sun HK, Wang JH, Wang YY. Comprehensive review of Bayesian network applications in gastrointestinal cancers. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(6): 104299
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i6/104299.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.104299