Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2025; 16(6): 104299
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.104299
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.104299
Table 1 Six Bayesian network parameter learning algorithms
Algorithms | For incomplete datasets | Basic principle | Advantages & disadvantages | Ref. |
Maximum likelihood estimate | No | Estimates parameters by maximizing the likelihood function based on observed data | Fast convergence; no prior knowledge used, leading to slow convergence | [18] |
Bayesian method | No | Uses a prior distribution (often Dirichlet) and updates it with observed data to obtain a posterior distribution | Incorporates prior knowledge; computationally intensive | [19] |
Expectation-maximization | Yes | Estimates parameters by iteratively applying expectation (E) and maximization (M) steps to handle missing data | Effective with missing data; can converge to local optima | [20] |
Robust bayesian estimate | Yes | Estimates parameters using probability intervals to represent the ranges of conditional probabilities without assumptions | Does not require assumptions about missing data; interval width indicates reliability of estimation | [12] |
Monte-Carlo method | Yes | Uses random sampling (e.g., Gibbs sampling) to estimate the expectation of the joint probability distribution | Flexible and can handle complex models; computationally expensive and convergence can be slow | [21] |
- Citation: Zhang MN, Xue MJ, Zhou BZ, Xu J, Sun HK, Wang JH, Wang YY. Comprehensive review of Bayesian network applications in gastrointestinal cancers. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(6): 104299
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i6/104299.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.104299