Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. May 24, 2025; 16(5): 105881
Published online May 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.105881
Published online May 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.105881
Table 4 Baseline characteristics of the original patient population in the included studies before propensity score matching and/or subgroup analyses, mean ± avg for numerical ones, n (%)
Ref. | Age (years) | Sex | Child-Pugh/BCLC | Tumor size (cm) | MELD |
Bai et al[10] | LR: 277 (20.6) > 60 years; RFA: 213 (24.9) > 60 years | LR: M = 1138 (84.6); RFA: M = 694 (81.3) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 1243 (92.4); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 694 (81.3) | LR: 690 (51.3) < 3 cm; RFA: 710 (83.2) < 3 cm | |
Gory et al[13] | LR: 59.3 ± 10.7; RFA: 65.1 ± 10.0 | LR: M = 42 (81); RFA: M = 71 (74) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 46 (88.4); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 75 (78.1) | LR: 3.03 ± 1.08; RFA: 2.3 ± 0.96 | LR: 8.4 ± 2.1; RFA: 10.1 ± 3.2 |
He et al[14] | LR: 47.4 ± 12.4; RFA: 53.9 ± 12.8 | LR: M = 257 (83); RFA: M = 110 (88) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 305 (98); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 118 (94) | LR: 3.3 ± 1.0; RFA: 2.6 ± 1.0 | |
Liu et al[18] | LR: 60 ± 13; RFA: 64 ± 12 | LR: M = 78 (72); RFA: M = 84 (66) | LR: BCLC 0 = 109 (100); RFA: BCLC 0 = 128 (100) | LR: 109 (100) ≤ 2 cm; RFA: 128 (100) ≤ 2 cm | LR: 7.8 ± 1.3; RFA: 8.4 ± 2.5 |
Lu et al[20] | LR: 50.1 ± 10.9; RFA: 52.9 ± 11.8 | LR: M = 124 (89.9); RFA: M = 172 (88.7) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 138 (100); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 194 (100) | LR: 2.8 ± 1.9; RFA: 1.9 ± 0.9 | |
Qiu et al[22] | LR: 55.5 ± 12.9; RFA: 56.6 ± 11.2 | LR: M = 98 (79.6); RFA: M = 118 (86.7) | LR: Child-Pugh = 5.8 ± 1.0; RFA: Child-Pugh = 6.1 ± 1.1 | LR: 3.1 ± 1.3; RFA: 2.9 ± 1.1 | LR: 9.2 ± 2.7; RFA: 10.7 ± 4.8 |
Takayasu et al[25] | LR: 139 (79) > 60 years; RFA: 397 (80.9) > 60 years | LR: M = 104 (59.1); RFA: M = 297 (60.5) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 151 (85.8); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 394 (80.2) | LR: 176 (100) ≤ 2 cm; RFA: 491 (100) ≤ 2 cm | |
Vitale et al[26] | LR: 132 (44.6) > 70 years; RFA: 129 (53.8) > 70 years | LR: M = 227 (76.7); RFA: M = 181 (75.4) | LR: Child-Pugh B = 28 (9.5); RFA: Child-Pugh B = 62 (25.8) | LR: 296 (100) ≤ 3 cm; RFA: 240 (100) ≤ 3 cm | LR: ≥ 8 = 199 (67.2); RFA: ≥ 8 = 170 (70.8) |
Xia et al[29] | LR: 50.0 (24.0-58.0); RFA: 52.0 (25.0-59.0) | LR: M = 107 (89.2); RFA: M = 109 (90.8) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 120 (100); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 120 (100) | LR: 81 (67.5) < 3 cm; RFA: 78 (65.0) < 3 cm | |
Zeng et al[31] | LR: 66-75 years = 262 (65.0); RFA: 66-75 years = 152 (60.8) | LR: M = 281 (69.7); RFA: M = 172 (68.8) | LR: 180 (44.6) = 2-5 cm; RFA: 184 (73.6) = 2-5 cm | ||
Zhong et al[32] | LR: 90 (29.3) ≥ 60 years; RFA: 184 (34.1) ≥ 60 years | LR: M = 245 (79.8); RFA: M = 482 (89.3) | LR: Child-Pugh A = 300 (97.7); RFA: Child-Pugh A = 523 (96.9) | LR: 135 (44.0) < 3 cm; RFA: 425 (78.7) < 3 cm |
- Citation: Cicerone O, Mantovani S, Oliviero B, Basilico G, Corallo S, Quaretti P, Maestri M. Navigating the evidence for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Surgery vs radiofrequency ablation through sentiment and meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(5): 105881
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i5/105881.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.105881