BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2025; 16(12): 112871
Published online Dec 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.112871
Table 2 Outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection groups according to lesion size, n (%)
Characteristic1A (< 10 mm, n = 56)
1B (10-20 mm, n = 28)
ESD (n = 41)
Hybrid ESD (n = 15)
t/χ2 value
P value
ESD (n = 20)
Hybrid ESD (n = 8)
t/χ2 value
P value
Procedure time, minute44.00 (16.00)30.00 (13.00)14.905< 0.00150.50 (10.00)33.00 (20.00)11.471< 0.001
Follow-up time, month22.00 (24.00)30.00 (27.00)1.4260.23226.50 (31.50)48.00 (22.00)4.9050.027
Perforation0 (0.00)0 (0.00)//1 (5.00)0 (0.00)0.4151.000
Delayed hemorrhage1 (2.43)0 (0.00)0.3731.0000 (0.00)1 (12.50)2.5930.286
En bloc resection41 (100.00)15 (100.00)//20 (100.00)8 (100.00)//
R0 resection37 (90.24)13 (86.67)0.1470.65416 (80.00)7 (87.50)0.2191.000
Recurrence0 (0.00)0 (0.00)//0 (0.00)0 (0.00)//


Write to the Help Desk