BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2025; 16(12): 110988
Published online Dec 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.110988
Table 4 Perioperative immunotherapy: Emerging data on perioperative immunotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
Trial name
Disease subtype
Strategy
pCR rate
EFS
GASPAR (2022)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT + spartalizumabEarly data: Major response rate of 50%Not reported yet
DRAGON (2024)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative SOX ± camrelizumab + rivoceranib 18.3% (SOX + RC) vs 5.0% (SOX)Not reported yet
OR: 4.5; P < 0.001
VESTIGE (2020/2025)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaAdjuvant Ipi/Nivo vs adjuvant CT after neoadjuvant CTNot an endpoint11.4 months (Ipi/Nivo) vs 20.8 months (CT)
HR: 1.55 (1.07-2.25); P = 0.99
ATTRACTION-5 (2024)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaAdjuvant CT (CAPOX or S-1) ± nivolumabNot an endpoint3-year RFS: 68.4% (nivolumab) vs 65.3% (CT)
HR: 0.9 (0.69-1.18); P = 0.44
KEYNOTE-585 (2023)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative CT (cisplatin-based or FLOT) ± pembrolizumab12.9% (CT + pembrolizumab) vs 2.0% (CT)44.4 months (CT + pembrolizumab) vs 25.3 months (CT)
P < 0.00001HR: 0.81 (0.67-0.99); P = 0.0198
For dMMR/MSI: 38.1%Did not meet the threshold for statistical significance (P = 0.0178)
DANTE (2024)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT ± atezolizumab24% (FLOT + atezolizumab) vs 15% (FLOT); P = 0.032No data
For CPS ≥ 10: 33% vs 12%
For dMMR/MSI: 63% vs 27%
MATTERHORN (2024/2025)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT ± durvalumab19.2% (FLOT + durvalumab) vs 7.2% (FLOT)2-year EFS: 67.4% vs 58.2% HR: 0.71 (0.58-0.86)
RR: 2.69, (1.86-3.9), P < 0.00001The difference between the groups in OS has not reached statistical significance


Write to the Help Desk