BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2025; 16(12): 110988
Published online Dec 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.110988
Table 3 Perioperative therapy: Landmark studies assessing perioperative therapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
Trial name
Disease subtype
Strategy
R0 resection rate
OS
MAGIC (2006)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative ECF vs surgery79.3% (ECF) vs 70.3%; P = 0.035-year OS: 36.3% (ECF) vs 23%
HR: 0.75 (0.60-0.93); P = 0.009
FFCD 9703/ACCORD (2011)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative 5-FU/cisplatin vs sugery84% (5-FU/cisplatin) vs 74%; P = 0.045-year OS: 38% (5-FU/cisplatin) vs 24%
HR OS: 0.69 (0.5-0.95); P = 0.02
CRITICS (2018)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative CT vs perioperative CT + postoperative radiotherapy80% (CT) vs 82% (CT + RDT)Median OS: 43 months vs 37 months
HR 1.01 (0.84-1.22), P = 0.9
FLOT4-AIO (2019)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT vs ECF/ECX85% (FLOT) vs 78% (ECF/ECX); P = 0.0162Median OS: 50 months vs 35 months
HR 0.77 (0.63-0.94), P = 0.012
ESOPEC (2024)GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT vs preoperative-CRT94.3% (FLOT) vs 95% (CRT)3-year OS: 57.4% (FLOT) vs 50.7% (CRT)
HR: 0.7 (0.53-0.92), P = 0.01
5-year OS: 50.6% (FLOT) vs 38.7% (CRT)
pCR: 16.7% (FLOT) vs 10.1% (CRT)Median OS: 66 months (FLOT) vs 37 months (CRT)
TOPGEARG/GEJ adenocarcinomaPreoperative CRT + perioperative CT vs perioperative CTNo R0 difference (92%)Median OS: 46 months (CRT) vs 49 months (CT)
pCR: 17% (CRT) vs 8% (CT)HR: 1.05 (0.83-1.31)
RESOLVE (2021)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative SOX vs93% (perioperative SOX) vs 88% (adjuvant SOX) vs 87% (adjuvant CAPOX) P = 0.075No OS data
Adjuvant SOX vs adjuvant CAPOXpCR: 19% (perioperative SOX) vs 14% (adjuvant SOX)
RESONANCE (2024)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative SOX vs adjuvante SOX94.9% (perioperative SOX) vs 83.7% (adjuvant SOX), P < 0.0001No OS data
pCR: 22.3%
AIO/CAO STO 0801 (2018)GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative ECX ± PaNo difference in R0 resection rateNo difference in OS: 49% (ECX + Pa) vs 62% (ECX)
80% (ECX + Pa) vs 82% (ECX)HR: 1.37 (0.84-2.25), P = 0.2
HERFLOT (2014/2023)HER2 + G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT ± TPreliminary dataPreliminary data
R0 ressection rate: 92.9%3-year OS: 82.1%
pCR: 21.4%
PETRARCA (2022)HER2 + G/GEJ adenocarcinomaPerioperative FLOT ± T ± PeThe trial was closed prematurelyThe trial was closed prematurely
R0 ressection rate: 90% (FLOT) vs 93% (FLOT + T + Pe)Median OS not reached
pCR: 12% (FLOT) vs 35% (FLOT + T + Pe)HR: 0.56, P = 0.24


Write to the Help Desk