BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2025; 16(12): 110988
Published online Dec 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i12.110988
Table 1 Adjuvant therapy: Summary of key randomized trials evaluating adjuvant therapy strategies in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
Trial name
Disease subtype
Strategy
DFS
OS
INT-0116 (SWOG 9008) (2001/2012)G/GEJ adenocarcinomaAdjuvant CRT vs observation10-year median DFS: 27 months (CRT) vs 19 months10-year median OS: 35 months (CRT) vs 27 months
HR: 1.51 (1.25-1.83)HR: 1.32 (1.10-1.60)
P < 0.001P = 0.0046
CLASSIC trial (2012/2014)Gastric adenocarcinomaAdjuvant CT (CAPOX) vs observation5-year DFS: 68% (CAPOX) vs 53%5-year OS: 78% (CAPOX) vs 69%
HR: 0.58 (0.47-0.72)HR: 0.66 (0.51-0.85)
P < 0.0001P = 0.0015
ARTIST trial (2012/2015)Mostly gastric adenocarcinoma (few GEJ)Adjuvant CT vs adjuvant CRT3-year DFS: 78.2% (CRT) vs 74.2% (CT)5-year OS: 75% (CRT) vs 73% (CT)
P = 0.0862
Subgrup with node metastasis 3-year DFS
77.5% (CRT) vs 72.3% (CT)
HR: 0.68 (0.47-0.99)HR: 1.13 (0.77-1.64)
P = 0.0471P = 0.52
ARTIST 2 trial (2021)Gastric adenocarcinoma only and node positiveAdjuvant3-year DFS: 64.8% (S-1), 74.3% (SOX), 72.8% (SOXRT)No OS data so far (secondary endpoint)
S-1HR S-1 vs SOX: 0.692, P = 0.042
HR S-1 vs SOXRT: 0.724, P = 0.074
SOX vs SOXRTNo difference was found between SOX and SOXRT (HR 0.971, P = 0.879)


Write to the Help Desk