©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2025; 16(10): 112392
Published online Oct 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i10.112392
Published online Oct 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i10.112392
Table 2 Baseline patient characteristics across included studies
| Ref. | Age (mean ± SD) ropeginterferon; standard | Sex (male/female) ropeginterferon; standard | Hematocrit (mean ± SD, %) ropeginterferon; standard | Platelet count (mean ± SD, × 109; L) ropeginterferon; standard | Leucocyte count (mean ± SD, × 109; L) ropeginterferon; standard | Spleen size (mean ± SD, cm) ropeginterferon; standard | Splenomegaly (%) ropeginterferon; standard |
| Barbui et al[20], 2023 | 50.8 ± 7.4; 49.8 ± 10.4 | 47/17; 39/24 | 43.9 ± 2.0; 44.0 ± 2.7 | 620 ± 188; 640 ± 260 | 10.9 ± 3.9; 10.4 ± 4.9 | 2.3 ± 0.8; 3.2 ± 2.3 | 33.3; 28.6 |
| Barbui et al[19], 2024 | 50.8 ± 7.4; 49.8 ± 10.4 | 47/17; 39/24 | 43.9 ± 2.0; 44.0 ± 2.7 | 620 ± 188; 640 ± 260 | 10.9 ± 3.9; 10.4 ± 4.9 | 2.3 ± 0.8; 3.2 ± 2.3 | 33.3; 28.6 |
| Gisslinger et al[22], 2020 (P) | 59.3 ± 10.5; 58.3 ± 14.3 | 59/68; 60/67 | 47.5 ± 5.3; 48.3 ± 5.3 | 502 ± 241; 482 ± 253 | 10.7 ± 4.1; 11.0 ± 5.0 | 13.0 ± 3.0; 13.2 ± 2.8 | 9.0; 12.0 |
| Gisslinger et al[22], 2020 (C) | 57.3 ± 10.5; 57.8 ± 12.5 | 48/47; 40/36 | 48.0 ± 5.7; 49.7 ± 5.2 | 513 ± 264; 486 ± 264 | 11.2 ± 5.0; 11.7 ± 4.8 | 13.3 ± 2.6; 13.2 ± 3.2 | 7.0; 11.0 |
| Kiladjian et al[18], 2022 (P) | 60.0 ± 10.4; 60.0 ± 14.1 | 59/68; 60/67 | 47.1 ± 5.3; 48.0 ± 5.9 | 485 ± 238; 452 ± 250 | 10.6 ± 4.0; 10.5 ± 4.9 | 15.3 ± 6.7; 15.5 ± 10.7 | 9.4; 11.8 |
- Citation: Tom L, Mani S, Rawat A, Nan M, Mundada SM, Al Khatib B, Gopinath A, Taj O, Salahuddin N, Shaju F, Parsa S, Abdurrahman M, Das A, Khawar MMH, Sher A. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b vs standard therapy in polycythemia vera: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(10): 112392
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i10/112392.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i10.112392