©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2024; 15(8): 1061-1077
Published online Aug 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1061
Published online Aug 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1061
Table 1 The College of American Pathologists standards and the group information
| The criteria of CAP standards for the assessment of tumor response to nCRT | ||
| Good responder | CAP0 | Complete response with no viable tumor cells |
| CAP1 | Only small clusters or single cancer cells remained | |
| Poor-responder | CAP2 | Residual tumor cells remaining, but with predominant fibrosis |
| CAP3 | Poor response with extensive residual tumor cells | |
| The sub-group information of this study | ||
| Groups | Group 1 | Poor responders before nCRT |
| Group 2 | Good responders before nCRT | |
| Group 3 | Poor responders after nCRT | |
| Group 4 | Good responders after nCRT | |
- Citation: Li GB, Shi WK, Zhang X, Qiu XY, Lin GL. Hsa-miR-483-5p/mRNA network that regulates chemotherapy resistance in locally advanced rectal cancer identified through plasma exosome transcriptomics. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15(8): 1061-1077
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v15/i8/1061.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1061