©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2021; 12(9): 808-822
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.808
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.808
Table 1 Classification of imaging features based on American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon
| Imaging feature | Classification |
| Mammogram | |
| Appearance | Mass |
| Asymmetry | |
| High risk microcalcifications1 | |
| Architectural distortion | |
| Ultrasound | |
| Margins | Spiculated |
| Microlobulated | |
| Circumscribed | |
| Posterior acoustic features | Shadowing |
| Enhancement | |
| Mixed | |
| None | |
| Size | Maximum dimension on ultrasound (in mm) |
| Echogenicity | Homogenous |
| Heterogeneous | |
| Complex cystic | |
| Adler’s index | Low (Grade I) |
| Medium (Grade II) | |
| High (Grade III) |
- Citation: Ian TWM, Tan EY, Chotai N. Role of mammogram and ultrasound imaging in predicting breast cancer subtypes in screening and symptomatic patients. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(9): 808-822
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i9/808.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.808