Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2021; 12(2): 43-49
Published online Feb 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i2.43
Table 2 Survival and toxicity results of the phase 3 randomized clinical trials of second-generation antihormonal treatments in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Trial
Follow-up in mo
Main results
Quality of life
Toxicity
LATITUDE51.8Reduced mortality risk by 34% with abiraterone (P < 0.001); OS at 3 yr (66% vs 49%); median OS (53.3 mo vs 36.5 mo). Reduction in risk of radiographic progression by 53% with abiraterone (P < 0.001) (33 mo vs 14.8 mo)Abiraterone improved all QoL-related parametersToxicity grade 3-4: (1) Abiraterone: 63%; (2) Placebo: 48%. Treatment-related deaths: (1) Abiraterone: 5%; and (2) Placebo: 4%
STAMPEDE40Reduction in mortality risk of 39% with abiraterone (P < 0.001). Reduction in risk of progression of 69% with abiraterone (P < 0.001). Treatment benefit in all patients according to risk group and disease volume-Toxicity grade ≥ 3: (1) Abiraterone: 47%; and (2) ADT: 33%
ENZAMET33Reduction in mortality risk by 67% with enzalutamide (P = 0.002). 3-yr OS (82% vs 72%)No SDToxicity grade ≥ 3: (1) Enzalutamide: 58%; and (2) AA: 43%
TITAN22.7Reduction in risk of radiographic progression or death by 52% with apalutamide (P < 0.001). 2-yr rPFS (68.2% vs 47.5%). Reduction in mortality risk of 33% with apalutamide (P = 0.005). 2-yr OS (82.4% vs 73.5%). Treatment benefit in all patients according to disease volume, significant in rPFS and OS in high-volume diseaseNo SDToxicity grade 3-4: (1) Apalutamide: 42.2%; and (2) Placebo: 40.8%. Treatment-related deaths: (1) Apalutamide: 1.9%; and (2) Placebo: 3%
ARCHES14.4Reduction in risk of radiographic progression or death of 61% with enzalutamide (P < 0.001) (NR vs 19 mo). OS (P = 0.336). Benefit in rPFS in both high and low volume diseaseNo SDNo SD. Treatment-related deaths: (1) Enzalutamide: 2.4%; and (2) Placebo: 1.7%