Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2020; 11(2): 74-82
Published online Feb 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.74
Table 1 Original articles (n = 6) analysing incidence of abdominal/retroperitoneal metastases in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma
Ref.TopicPatients
(Prevalent) Histological subtype(s)Chemotherapy/ radiotherapyOutcome (after diagnosis of metastasis)
Total number of STS (n), of whom eSTS, n (%)Of whom eSTS with AM/RM, n (%)
Thompson et al[16], 2015Diagnostic pathway140 (100)7 (5.0) AMEpithelioid sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, synovial sarcomaN/AN/A
King et al[9], 2009Diagnostic pathway, outcome124 (100)7 (5.6) AMMPNST, leiomyosarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, pleomorphic sarcomaN/A21% mortality rate (n = 21/124)
Gorelik et al[6], 2018Diagnostic pathway33 (100)4 (12.1) AMMyxoid liposarcoma89% of patients with metastases (including others than AM) received neoadj. RTX 22% received adj. RTX for primary tumourN/A
Behranwala et al[8], 2004Therapeutic approach2127 (100)19 (0.9) AMMyxoid liposarcoma, leiomyosarcomaCTX + RTX in 3 patients, and CTX or RTX in 1 patient each following resection of AMMedian OS: 12 mo
Ogose et al[11], 2000Therapeutic approach282 (100)24 (8.5) AMLiposarcomaNone of patients with AM received RTX or CTXMean OS (liver/GI metastases): 4.6 mo; Mean OS (pancreatic metastasis): 3.3 mo
Sheah et al[7], 2008Diagnostic pathway112 (100)9 (8.0) AM; 2 (1.8) RMMyxoid liposarcomaN/AN/A