©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2020; 11(12): 968-975
Published online Dec 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.968
Published online Dec 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.968
Table 1 Barriers to implementing remote consultations
| Technological barriers |
| Availability of smart phones or mobile devices |
| Mobile network coverage |
| Lack of a dedicated, properly-equipped office in the hospital to conveniently and rapidly program and conduct a remote visit that is comparable to a real-life consultation. This equipment would include videoconferencing software to allow for a proper anamnesis, with hands-free headphones to allow the physician to record data on the eMR, and automatic telephone dialling |
| Electronic medical record formats and the capability to order complementary tests through the software |
| Physical barriers |
| Telephone consultation and difficult anamnesis in some cases, such as patients with a laryngectomy, cognitive impairment, hearing loss, neurological diseases, or poor language skills (i.e., foreigners), etc; |
| Impossibility of performing a correct physical examination of patients |
| Communication barriers |
| Physicians |
| Use of technical jargon |
| Semantic barriers: Inability to understand the language used by the sender or the receiver |
| Lack of body language signals (telephone consultations) |
| Potential lack of empathy in telephone consultations |
| External interruptions |
| Patients |
| Mental (“not thinking clearly”) and emotional blocks |
| Fear of asking questions |
| Lack of family support during the teleconsultation |
| Potential misinterpretation of the message |
| Feelings of inferiority |
| Misinformed or “overinformed” (infodemia) |
| External interruptions |
| Difficulties in understanding how to behave in this unique setting: Respect, cordiality and a collaborative attitude |
| Psychological barriers |
| Physicians |
| Feelings of insecurity due to work processes outside of routine practices; |
| Perceived deterioration in the doctor-patient relationship, in which it is necessary to cede more power and autonomy to the patient with more open dialogue (and a less paternalistic relationship) |
| The need to use an appropriate tone of voice, ask clear and concise questions, use warm and friendly language, and practice active listening when communicating with patients |
| Potential to perceive a certain loss of humanity due to the lack of physical presence |
| Patients |
| If the patient cannot see the physician (e.g., telephone call), this can produce feelings of depersonalization |
| The patient may be accustomed to letting the physician make health-related decisions |
| The patient may have difficulties describing symptoms in a virtual setting |
| Bioethical barriers |
| Confidentiality and privacy |
| Data protection |
| The remote consultation cannot replace a face-to-face visit, but rather complements it |
| Risks related to computer security and hacking |
- Citation: Fernández C, Ruiz V, Couñago F. COVID-19 and information and communication technology in radiation oncology: A new paradigm. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11(12): 968-975
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v11/i12/968.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.968