©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2019; 10(6): 234-246
Published online Jun 24, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i6.234
Published online Jun 24, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i6.234
Table 3 Subgroup analysis of the association between SOX2 expression (high vs low) and LMN and DM
| Variable | LNM | DM | |||||||||||||||
| Studies | Model (I2%) | OR (95%CI) | P-value | Studies | Model (I2%) | OR (95%CI) | P-value | ||||||||||
| Sample size | |||||||||||||||||
| < 150 | 13 | R (83) | 1.85 (0.96-3.56) | 0.06 | 12 | F (47) | 2.16 (1.61-2.91) | < 0.0001 | |||||||||
| ≥ 150 | 5 | R (85) | 0.93 (0.43-2.01) | 0.11 | 1 | N/A | 0.24 (0.05-1.15) | 0.007 | |||||||||
| Cancer type | |||||||||||||||||
| Head and neck | 6 | R (88) | 1.89 (0.72-4.96) | 0.19 | 7 | F (39) | 2.46 (1.63-3.72) | < 0.0001 | |||||||||
| Esophagus | 3 | R (79) | 0.98 (0.24-4.04) | 0.98 | 1 | N/A | 0.56 (0.09-3.57) | 0.54 | |||||||||
| Cervix | - | - | - | - | 1 | N/A | 3.12 (0.99-9.82) | 0.05 | |||||||||
| Stomach | 4 | R (85) | 0.68 (0.21-2.24) | 0.53 | 2 | R (56) | 0.56 (0.16-1.96) | 0.36 | |||||||||
| Breast | 2 | F (0) | 2.87 (1.50-5.50) | 0.002 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Liver | 1 | N/A | 1.68 (0.39-7.32) | 0.49 | 1 | N/A | 4.80 (1.56-14.76) | 0.006 | |||||||||
| Lung | 1 | N/A | 1.74 (1.02-2.89) | 0.04 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Colon | 1 | N/A | 4.15 (1.43-12.09) | 0.009 | 1 | N/A | 3.04 (1.15-8.04) | 0.03 | |||||||||
| Quality score | |||||||||||||||||
| ≥ 7 | 12 | R (88) | 1.64 (0.82-3.27) | 0.16 | 7 | R (69) | 2.23 (1.04-4.77) | 0.04 | |||||||||
| < 7 | 6 | R (79) | 1.38 (0.60-3.18) | 0.45 | 6 | F (35) | 1.71 (0.89-3.27) | 0.11 | |||||||||
- Citation: Javaeed A, Ghauri SK. Metastatic potential and prognostic significance of SOX2: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10(6): 234-246
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v10/i6/234.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v10.i6.234