Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Biol Chem. Sep 5, 2026; 17(3): 125024
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.125024
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.125024
Table 1 Performance characteristics, limitations, and pitfalls of anti-dsDNA autoantibody testing
| Assay | Study populations | Control groups | Assay manufacturers | Reference standards | Cutoffs | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | ROCAUC1 | Limitations and pitfalls | Ref. |
| CLIFT | SLE patients, lupus nephritis, ANA-positive connective tissue diseases | Healthy controls, disease controls (RA, Sjögren syndrome, SSc, MCTD, infections) | Euroimmun, Bio-Rad, Immuno Concepts, Inova, NOVA Lite | ACR/EULAR SLE classification criteria, clinical diagnosis, comparator anti-dsDNA assays | Manufacturer-defined serum dilution (typically 1:10-1:20) | 47-70 | 95-100 | 0.80-0.90 | Low sensitivity; subjectivity and operator dependence; technical variability: Affected by serum dilution, substrate prep, microscope systems, and conjugate performance; limits reproducibility (though AI automated image analysis is emerging to help) | [49,77-79] |
| Farr RIA | SLE patients, lupus nephritis | Healthy controls; autoimmune disease controls | Trinity biotech; laboratory-developed assays | ACR/EULAR criteria, clinical diagnosis, comparator assays | Manufacturer-defined (IU/mL or cpm) | 70-85 | 95-100 | 0.75-0.95 | The short shelf-life of reagents and requirement for handling radioactive tracers | [80-85] |
| ELISA | SLE patients, lupus nephritis, autoimmune diseases | Healthy controls; autoimmune disease controls | UROIMMUN, Thermo Fisher (Phadia), Inova, Bio-Rad, AESKU, Orgentec, Trinity | ACR/EULAR criteria, clinical diagnosis, CLIFT/Farr comparison | Manufacturer-specific (IU/mL) | 70-90 | 80-95 | 0.84-0.90 | Lower specificity: Detects both low- and high-avidity IgG autoantibodies Susceptibility to cross-reactivity (e.g., with anti-ssDNA or other nuclear antigens); performance variability: Highly influenced by the specific antigen source, coating conditions, and manufacturer | [49,78,82] |
| CLIA/FEIA | SLE patients, lupus nephritis; systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases | Healthy controls; autoimmune disease controls | Werfen (BIO-FLASH), Thermo Fisher (EliA), Fujirebio | Clinical diagnosis, CLIFT/Farr comparison | Manufacturer-specific (IU/mL) | 75-90 | 90-98 | 0.88-0.95 | The lack of inter-laboratory standardization and harmonization | [49,78,82] |
| MFI | SLE patients; systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases | Healthy controls; autoimmune disease controls | BioPlex®, FIDIS®, Luminex® platforms | Clinical diagnosis, comparator immunoassays | Manufacturer-specific fluorescence units | 70-90 | 90-98 | 0.80-0.95 | Complexity: Requires complex instrumentation and specialized bioinformatics and data interpretation; bead-based variability: Analytical performance can vary based on how well the fluid-phase antigen interactions preserve native antigen conformation; high cost | [45,68,78,86,87] |
| Emerging Platforms (DLCM, Biosensors, Microarrays) | Primarily research cohorts of SLE patients | Healthy controls; limited disease controls | Research-use platforms | Comparator immunoassays (ELISA, CLIA, CLIFT) | Not standardized | - | - | > 0.90 | - | [88-90] |
- Citation: Bouayad A. Advances and pitfalls in anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibody detection and interpretation. World J Biol Chem 2026; 17(3): 125024
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8454/full/v17/i3/125024.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4331/wjbc.125024