Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2023; 15(5): 825-833
Published online May 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.825
Table 1 Comparison of the patients’ preoperative clinical data
Group
High ligation group, n = 46
Low ligation group, n = 148
P value
Sex as male/female28/1890/580.897
Age in yr, mean ± SD58.3 ± 10.160.4 ± 9.40.645
Tumor site0.178
Sigmoid colon1646-
Recto-sigmoid junction1334-
Upper rectum1039-
Lower rectum729-
Table 2 Surgical data
Variable
High ligation group, n = 46Low ligation group, n = 148P value
Operative time in min, mean ± SD210.0 ± 34.2232.0 ± 28.30.482
Blood loss in mL, mean ± SD145.0 ± 30.3187.0 ± 50.30.165
Patients with positive lymph nodes, n20600.854
Number of lymph nodes dissected, mean17.415.90.203
Patients with positive lymph nodes in the root of the inferior mesenteric artery, D253250.372
Time to recovery of bowel function in d, mean ± SD5.0 ± 1.83.0 ± 1.20.042
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative complications, n (%)
Complication
High ligation group, n = 46Low ligation group, n = 148P value
Number of complications12 (26)26 (186)0.436
Wound infection4 (9)13 (9)0.286
Stress ulcers2 (4)6 (4)0.316
Anastomotic fistula and stricture3 (7)5 (3)0.045
Urinary dysfunction3 (7)2 (1)0.029
Table 4 Postoperative recurrence
Recurrence site
High ligation group, n = 46
Low ligation group, n = 148
P value
Overall recurrence rate11 (24%)32 (21%)0.607
Liver39-
Lung411-
Lymph nodes26-
Local recurrence (intestinal tract)02-
Peritoneum24-