Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2017; 9(1): 19-24
Published online Jan 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.19
Published online Jan 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.19
Table 3 Postoperative course (n = 20)
| Observations | Postoperative days (mean/median) | Standard deviation OR IQR (1st-3rd) |
| Time to return bowel sounds | 3.53 | ± 0.91 |
| Time to start feeding via FJ | 4 | 4-5 |
| Time to start oral feed | 12 | 10.75-18.5 |
| Time of clamping of Gastrostomy | 9.87 | ± 3.75 |
| Time of clamping of RD | 13 | ± 4.18 |
| Time of removal of Gastrostomy | 13 | 12-16.5 |
| Time of removal of RD | 16 | 16.25-22.25 |
| Time of removal of FJ | 18 | 16.5-24 |
| Total hospital Stay | 22 | 19-26 |
| Wound healing time | 15.75 | ± 1.91 |
- Citation: Agarwal N, Malviya NK, Gupta N, Singh I, Gupta S. Triple tube drainage for “difficult” gastroduodenal perforations: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 9(1): 19-24
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v9/i1/19.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.19