Contemporary review of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy

Table 3 Robotic assisted procedures

Ref.	Year	Robotic, open, Lap, or RAL	No. of patients	Age of Patients	BMI of patients	ASA classification	EBL (mL)	Transfusion (#)	Op time (min)	Conversion (#)	Overall complications (# of patients)	Panc fistula	Length of stay	Postop death
Chalikonda et al[32]	2012	RAL	30	62	24.8	2.6	485	NR	4761	3	9	2	9.791	1
Giulianotti et al[33]	2010	RAL	60	58	NR	NR	394	6	421	11	No PD only	19	22	2
Kuroki et al[34]	2012	RAL	20	71.2 ± 8.8	21.9	1.5 ± 0.6	376.6 ± 291.41	01	656.6 ± 191.4	NR	9	12	NR	NR
Lai et al[35]	2012	RAL	132	66.4 ± 11.9	NR	1.8	2471	NR	491.51± 94	1	10	7	13.71± 6.1	0
Zeh et al[36]	2012	RAL	50	68 ± 16	27 ± 5	2.6	3501	11	5681	8	28	11	101	1

¹Indicates statistically significant compared to open procedures. RAL: Robotic assisted laparoscopy; BMI: Body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification; EBL: Estimated blood loss; NR: Not reported; PD: Pancreaticoduodenectomy.