Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2014; 6(9): 169-174
Published online Sep 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i9.169
Published online Sep 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i9.169
Table 2 Characteristics of the ileostomy reversal procedure, including surgical technique and skin closure
| Surgical variable | n (%) |
| Ileostomy closure technique | 93 (100) |
| Stapled anastomosis | 9 (9.7) |
| Handsewn anastomosis | 84 (90.3) |
| Side-to-side with resection | 28 (33.3) |
| End-to-end with resection | 8 (9.5) |
| End-to-end without resection | 48 (57.1) |
| Skin closure technique | 70 (100) |
| Staples | 17 (24) |
| Subcuticular | 29 (41) |
| Interrupted suture | 24 (34) |
- Citation: Rubio-Perez I, Leon M, Pastor D, Diaz Dominguez J, Cantero R. Increased postoperative complications after protective ileostomy closure delay: An institutional study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(9): 169-174
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v6/i9/169.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v6.i9.169