Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2014; 6(2): 14-26
Published online Feb 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14
Table 1 Clinical methods
AuthorType ofstudyLoen (CAL/non-CAL)Colorectal/rectumStapled/handsewn anastomosisStudy subject/toolSeSpPPVNPVROCMain outcome
Dekker et al[22]Pro3b10/121Colorectal?Leakage score----0.95OR = 1.74 for leakage score predictive of CAL
den Dulk et al[23]Pro2b21/223ColorectalBothLeakage score-----Delay of treatment reduced from 4 d to 1.5 d
Sutton et al[18]Pro3b22/398Colorectal?Clinical symptoms0.330.970.590.93Over 40% of patients with cardiac event has CAL
Haase et al[19]Pro43/40Colorectal?Clinical symptoms-----No difference in heart rate variability between CAL and non-CAL
Ghariani et al[17]Retro3b23/314Colon?Clinical symptoms-----Respiratory, neurological disorders and bloating precipitate CAL
Bellows et al[16]Retro3b25/311Colorectal?Clinical symptomsRespiratory symptoms0.520.840.220.95-Respiratory, neurological disorders and abdominal pain and distension precipitate CAL
Neurology symptoms0.240.970.40.94-
Abdominal pain and distension0.520.830.210.95-
Nesbakken et al[20]Pro3b5/56Rectum?Clinical symptomsDaily assessment by surgeon0.500.890.50.89-50% of CAL is silent
Tang et al[21]Pro3b10/195RectumBothDigital rectal examination0.98----As valuable as WSCE before stoma closure
Pettigrew et al[13]Pro3b28/113Colorectal and general?Risk prediction by surgeon0.380.910.560.82Highest predictive value for postop surg assessment
Makela et al[14]Retro3b44/88RectumBothRisk prediction by surgeon-----In 86% of pts with > 3 risk factors CAL occurs
Karliczek et al[15]Pro3b26/191Colorectal?Risk prediction by surgeonHigh anastomosis0.380.46---Low predictive value for prediction of CAL by surgeon
Low anastomosis0.620.52---