Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 6, Issue 12

Peer-Review Report of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews

World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2014; 6(12): 241-247
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 PRISMA flow chart showing trial selection methodology. RCT: Randomized controlled trial.

Citation: Sajid MS, McFall MR, Whitehouse PA, Sains PS. Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(12): 241-247
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v6/i12/241.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241

Sajid MS, McFall MR, Whitehouse PA, Sains PS. Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(12): 241-247 [PMID: 25548609 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.