Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 6, Issue 12

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (12508)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

1054

WORD

381

HTML

6649

Figures (1-5)

235

Tables (1-3)

174

Sum=8493

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

775

Download

1306

Sum=2081

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

983

Download

951

Sum=1934

Dec 27, 2014 (publication date) through May 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (32)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews

World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2014; 6(12): 241-247
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 PRISMA flow chart showing trial selection methodology. RCT: Randomized controlled trial.

Citation: Sajid MS, McFall MR, Whitehouse PA, Sains PS. Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(12): 241-247
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v6/i12/241.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241