Drainage vs no drainage in secondary peritonitis with sepsis following complicated appendicitis in adults in the modern era of antibiotics

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 11

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

437

HTML

3042

Tables (1-3)

143

Sum=3622

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1157

Download

830

Sum=1987

Nov 27, 2013 (publication date) through May 10, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Nov 27, 2013; 5(11): 300-305
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.300

Table 3 Clinico-pathological profile of patients requiring second surgery n (%)

Indications	Duration¹(n = 88)	Drainage cohort (n = 121)	Non-drainage cohort
Subacute intestinalobstruction	28-35 d	1 (1.1)	1 (0.82)
Incisional hernia	6-11 mo	2 (2.2)	2 (1.60)

¹Period after the primary surgery.

Citation: Rather SA, Bari SU, Malik AA, Khan A. Drainage vs no drainage in secondary peritonitis with sepsis following complicated appendicitis in adults in the modern era of antibiotics. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013; 5(11): 300-305
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i11/300.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.300