©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2011; 3(8): 113-118
Published online Aug 27, 2011. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i8.113
Published online Aug 27, 2011. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i8.113
Table 4 Histological characteristics of patients with proximal and distal rectal cancer
| Histological criteria | Proximal rectal cancer (100) | Distal rectal cancer (118) |
| Differentiation1 | ||
| Well | 21 (21) | 17 (14) |
| Moderate | 69 (69) | 83 (70) |
| Poor | 8 (8) | 10 (9) |
| Presence of mucin | ||
| Mucinous | 5 (5) | 9 (8) |
| Signet ring | 0 (0) | 1 (1) |
| Tumour stage2 | ||
| T1 | 9 (9) | 8 (7) |
| T2 | 20 (20) | 28 (24) |
| T3 | 57 (57) | 66 (56) |
| T4 | 14 (14) | 16 (14) |
| Node stage3 | ||
| N0 | 58 (58) | 58 (49) |
| N1 | 15 (15) | 30 (25) |
| N2 | 21 (21) | 28 (24) |
| N3 | 3 (3) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: Wijenayake W, Perera M, Balawardena J, Deen R, Wijesuriya SR, Kumarage SK, Deen KI. Proximal and distal rectal cancers differ in curative resectability and local recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 3(8): 113-118
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v3/i8/113.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v3.i8.113