Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221
Table 6 Adjusted model for composite postoperative complications
| Predictors | OR | 95%CI | P value |
| Surgical approach | 0.24 | 0.07-0.79 | 0.019 |
| Age (per 1 year) | 1.00 | 0.94-1.06 | 0.997 |
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.64 | 0.21-1.91 | 0.425 |
| ASA (per 1 class) | 0.52 | 0.19-1.39 | 0.191 |
| FEV1 (per 1 L) | 0.38 | 0.10-1.39 | 0.143 |
| COPD (yes vs no) | 1.76 | 0.50-6.18 | 0.377 |
| Neoadjuvant therapy (yes vs no) | 0.30 | 0.09-1.01 | 0.053 |
- Citation: Chen YP, Zhang Y, Pan YH. Nursing outcome comparison of laparoscopy-assisted, pneumomediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy vs conventional thoracoscopic-assisted, three-incision esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 121221
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/121221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121221