Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221
Table 5 Adjusted analysis for postoperative length of stay by ordinary least squares regression
| Predictors | Beta | 95%CI | P value |
| const | 16.10 | 11.09-21.12 | < 0.001 |
| Group | -1.49 | -2.59 to -0.38 | 0.009 |
| Age | -0.04 | -0.10 to 0.02 | 0.176 |
| Gender | -0.86 | -2.20 to 0.47 | 0.202 |
| ASA | 0.46 | -0.45 to 1.37 | 0.314 |
| FEV1 | -0.57 | -1.88 to 0.74 | 0.389 |
| COPD | -0.21 | -1.48 to 1.07 | 0.750 |
| Neoadjuvant | 0.70 | -0.43 to 1.82 | 0.222 |
- Citation: Chen YP, Zhang Y, Pan YH. Nursing outcome comparison of laparoscopy-assisted, pneumomediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy vs conventional thoracoscopic-assisted, three-incision esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 121221
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/121221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121221