Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221
Table 4 Postoperative complications (safety outcomes), n (%)
| Variables | Control group | Observation group | Test | P value |
| Pulmonary complications | Fisher | 0.753 | ||
| No | 54 (90) | 46 (92) | ||
| Yes | 6 (10) | 4 (8) | ||
| Anastomotic leak | Fisher | 0.500 | ||
| No | 58 (96.70) | 50 (100) | ||
| Yes | 2 (3.30) | 0 (0) | ||
| Arrhythmia | Fisher | 0.008 | ||
| No | 52 (86.70) | 50 (100) | ||
| Yes | 8 (13.30) | 0 (0) | ||
| Deep vein thrombosis | Fisher | 1.000 | ||
| No | 58 (96.70) | 49 (98) | ||
| Yes | 2 (3.30) | 1 (2) | ||
| Reoperation | Fisher | 0.500 | ||
| No | 58 (96.70) | 50 (100) | ||
| Yes | 2 (3.30) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: Chen YP, Zhang Y, Pan YH. Nursing outcome comparison of laparoscopy-assisted, pneumomediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy vs conventional thoracoscopic-assisted, three-incision esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 121221
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/121221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121221