Nursing outcome comparison of laparoscopy-assisted, pneumomediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy vs conventional thoracoscopic-assisted, three-incision esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer

doi:10.4240/wjgs.121221

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 9

This Article

(2)

(3)

(0)

(27)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 121221
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121221

Table 3 Primary and key secondary recovery outcomes, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)

Variable	Control group	Observation group	Test	P value
Time to first ambulation (hours)	31 (24.80-36)	25 (20.20-32.50)	Mann-Whitney U	0.002
Time to first flatus (hours)	60.50 (49-72)	58 (50-67.80)	Mann-Whitney U	0.336
Time to first oral intake (hours)	93.50 (84.80-101.20)	74.50 (66.20-87.20)	Mann-Whitney U	4.726e-06
Drain duration (hours)	157 (135-185.20)	132 (104.80-156.80)	Mann-Whitney U	< 0.001
Postoperative LoS (days)	12.60 (10.90-14.80)	11.80 (9.20-13.80)	Mann-Whitney U	0.005
Recovery speed index (z-mean)	0.25 ± 0.52	-0.30 ± 0.39	Welch t	4.534e-09
30-day readmission			χ² test	0.523
No	53 (88.30)	46 (92)
Yes	7 (11.70)	4 (8)

LoS: Length of stay.

Full Size Table

Citation: Chen YP, Zhang Y, Pan YH. Nursing outcome comparison of laparoscopy-assisted, pneumomediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy vs conventional thoracoscopic-assisted, three-incision esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 121221
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/121221.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121221

Chen YP, Zhang Y, Pan YH. Nursing outcome comparison of laparoscopy-assisted, pneumomediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy vs conventional thoracoscopic-assisted, three-incision esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 121221 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.121221]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.