BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 120780
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120780
Table 2 Comparison of tumor-related data between two groups, n (%)
Item
Normal gastrointestinal recovery group (n = 218)
Delayed gastrointestinal recovery group (n = 75)
Statistic
P value
Tumor locationχ2 = 1.8620.426
Upper gastric58 (26.6)23 (30.7)
Middle gastric47 (21.6)18 (24.0)
Lower gastric92 (42.2)27 (36.0)
Diffuse type21 (9.6)7 (9.3)
Maximum tumor diameter (cm)4.2 ± 1.85.1 ± 2.1t = 3.5210.031
Lauren pathological type χ2 = 0.3240.518
Intestinal98 (45.0)31 (41.3)
Diffuse87 (39.9)32 (42.7)
Mixed33 (15.1)12 (16.0)
Degree of differentiationχ2 = 7.9180.019
Well-differentiated32 (14.7)6 (8.0)
Moderately differentiated95 (43.6)24 (32.0)
Poorly/undifferentiated91 (41.7)45 (60.0)
TNM staging χ2 = 8.2840.004
Stage I-II128 (58.7)30 (40.0)
Stage III90 (41.3)45 (60.0)


Write to the Help Desk