Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 120658
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120658
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120658
Table 6 Comparative imaging characteristics and advantages
| Characteristic | Conventional US | CE-MRI |
| Spatial resolution | Excellent for superficial lesions | Excellent for deep lesions |
| Soft tissue contrast | Moderate | Superior |
| Small lesion detection | Limited (< 1 cm) | Excellent (< 1 cm) |
| Vascular assessment | Limited (Doppler) | Comprehensive |
| Real-time capability | Yes | No |
| Cost-effectiveness | High | Moderate |
| Availability | Widespread | Limited in some areas |
| Operator dependency | High | Low |
- Citation: Deng T, Li XR. Complementary diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for post-hepatectomy hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 120658
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/120658.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.120658