Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 120658
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120658
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120658
Table 5 Detection of vascular invasion
| Vascular invasion type | n | US detection (%) | CE-MRI detection (%) | P value |
| PVTT | 16 | 62.5 (35.4-84.8) | 93.8 (69.8-99.8) | 0.012 |
| Hepatic vein invasion | 5 | 40.0 (5.3-85.3) | 100.0 (47.8-100.0) | 0.025 |
| Bile duct invasion | 7 | 42.9 (9.9-81.6) | 85.7 (42.1-99.6) | 0.035 |
| Inferior vena cava invasion | 3 | 33.3 (0.8-90.6) | 100.0 (29.2-100.0) | 0.046 |
| Microvascular invasion (imaging) | 22 | 45.5 (24.4-67.8) | 86.4 (65.1-97.1) | 0.002 |
| Multiple vascular invasion | 9 | 44.4 (13.7-78.8) | 88.9 (51.8-99.7) | 0.023 |
- Citation: Deng T, Li XR. Complementary diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for post-hepatectomy hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 120658
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/120658.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.120658