Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 120658
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120658
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120658
Table 3 Diagnostic performance stratified by lesion size
| Lesion size, cm | n | US sensitivity, % | CE-MRI sensitivity, % | P value |
| < 1 | 13 | 38.5 (13.9-68.4) | 87.5 (61.7-98.4) | < 0.001 |
| 1-2 | 28 | 60.7 (40.6-78.5) | 89.3 (71.8-97.7) | < 0.001 |
| > 2 | 35 | 85.7 (69.7-95.2) | 97.1 (85.1-99.9) | 0.065 |
| 2-3 | 15 | 80.0 (51.9-95.7) | 93.3 (68.1-99.8) | 0.091 |
| 3-5 | 12 | 91.7 (61.5-99.8) | 100.0 (73.5-100.0) | 0.478 |
| > 5 | 8 | 87.5 (47.3-99.7) | 100.0 (63.1-100.0) | 0.302 |
| Overall | 76 | 61.8 (49.2-73.3) | 92.6 (83.7-97.6) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Deng T, Li XR. Complementary diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for post-hepatectomy hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 120658
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/120658.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.120658