Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 119698
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119698
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119698
Table 4 Comparison of postoperative abdominal pain visual analog scale scores between two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | n | 2 hours postop | 6 hours postop | 12 hours postop | 24 hours postop |
| Conventional group | 40 | 2.02 ± 0.93 | 2.85 ± 1.23 | 2.22 ± 1.06 | 0.89 ± 0.50 |
| Optimized group | 40 | 1.86 ± 0.82 | 1.94 ± 0.81 | 1.43 ± 0.75 | 0.71 ± 0.42 |
| t value | - | 0.824 | 4.074 | 3.872 | 1.788 |
| P value | - | 0.412 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.077 |
| Main effect of “time” | F = 64.118, P < 0.001 | - | - | - | - |
| Main effect of “group” | F = 14.326, P < 0.001 | - | - | - | - |
| “Time × group” interaction | F = 5.046, P = 0.002 | - | - | - | - |
- Citation: Chen D, Li BZ, Yang F, Jin JY, Song X, Jiang JH. Retrospective study on the effects of different acupuncture protocols on gastrointestinal function recovery after general anesthesia gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 119698
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/119698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.119698