Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 119296
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119296
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119296
Table 2 Clinical decision framework for synchronous vs sequential transarterial chemoembolization-microwave ablation
| Clinical factor | Synchronous approach | Sequential approach |
| Tumor size | Small (≤ 3 cm) | Large (> 3 cm) |
| Tumor number | Solitary or oligofocal | Multiple/multifocal |
| Liver function | Good (Child-Pugh A) | Borderline (Child-Pugh B) |
| Tumor location | Accessible/superficial | Complex/deep/perivascular |
| ECOG performance | 0-1 | 2 |
| Treatment goal | Curative intent | Palliative/control |
| Expected tolerance | Good tolerance | Compromised tolerance |
| Follow-up capability | Reliable follow-up | Regular monitoring feasible |
- Citation: Ruan GY, Zhu Z, Cai ZZ, Lu GR, Wang QJ. Clinical applicability of synchronous vs sequential transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 119296
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i9/119296.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.119296