Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 121147
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121147
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121147
Table 5 Summary of clinical studies evaluating magnetic compression anastomosis for intestinal and colorectal conditions
| Ref. | Country | Design and patients | Indication | Main outcome | Adverse events and limitations |
| Graves et al[13], 2017 | United States | Prospective single-center first-in-human pilot study; n = 5 | Small bowel anastomosis during open reconstructive surgery | Formation of functional small bowel anastomosis without leak, bleeding, or stricture. Clinical success: 5/5 (100%); technical success: 5/5 (100%) | No anastomosis-related complications; unrelated complications included aspiration pneumonia, internal hernia, Clostridium difficile infection, and superficial surgical site infection |
| Kamada et al[63], 2021 | Japan | Retrospective single-center case series; n = 14 | Gastrointestinal obstruction (without general anesthesia) | Creation of functional gastrointestinal anastomosis to relieve obstruction. Clinical success: 11/14 (78.6%); technical success: 14/14 (100%) | Restenosis (n = 2); anastomotic perforation due to balloon dilation (n = 1) |
| Gagner et al[64], 2023 | Georgia | Prospective first-in-human observational study; n = 5 | Side-to-side magnetic compression duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy for obesity and type 2 diabetes | Successful creation of patent duodeno-ileal anastomosis with magnet expulsion without reintervention. Clinical success: 5/5 (100%); technical success: 5/5 (100%) | No device-related adverse events; mild abdominal wound pain (n = 3), mucosal tear during endoscopy (n = 1), intra-abdominal hematoma (n = 1), ileal serosal tear (n = 1) |
| Gagner et al[65], 2023 | Belgium, Spain, Georgia | Prospective multicenter observational study; n = 24 | Side-to-side magnetic duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy for obesity and type 2 diabetes | Successful magnet placement with formation of patent duodeno-ileal anastomosis and spontaneous magnet expulsion. Clinical success: 24/24 (100%); technical success: 24/24 (100%) | 3 procedure-related serious adverse events; no device-related adverse events, no anastomotic leak, bleeding, obstruction, infection, or mortality |
| Cadière et al[66], 2024 | Belgium | Prospective observational study; n = 10 | Side-to-side duodeno-ileal bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy | Patent duodeno-ileal anastomosis confirmed endoscopically at 1 year. Clinical success: 9/9 evaluated (100%); technical success: 10/10 (100%) | Serosal tears (n = 2), sleeve leak (n = 1), dehydration (n = 3), internal hernia (n = 1); no device-related AEs |
| Gagner et al[22], 2025 | Canada, Belgium, Spain, Georgia | Prospective multicenter study; n = 43 | Side-to-side magnetic duodeno-ileostomy with or without sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity | Successful magnet positioning, formation of patent duodeno-ileal anastomosis, and spontaneous magnet passage. Clinical success: 43/43 (100%); technical success: 43/43 (100%) | No device-related adverse events, leaks, bleeding, obstruction, infection, or death |
| Gagner et al[67], 2024 | Belgium | Prospective single-center study; n = 24 | Revisional side-to-side magnetic duodeno-ileostomy after sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity | Formation of patent duodeno-ileal anastomosis with spontaneous magnet expulsion and no need for reintervention. Clinical success: 24/24 (100%); technical success: 24/24 (100%) | 8 SAEs (Clavien-Dindo II-III) but none related to device or procedure; no leak, bleeding, obstruction, infection, or death |
| Gagner et al[68], 2024 | Belgium | Prospective single-center first-in-human study; n = 7 | Gastroileostomy for revision of sleeve gastrectomy | Successful placement and alignment of magnets with patent gastroileal anastomosis and spontaneous magnet expulsion. Clinical success: 7/7 (100%); technical success: 7/7 (100%) | 3 serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo III anal fissure/hemorrhoids in 1 patient); no device-related adverse events, leaks, bleeding, obstruction, infection, or death |
| Gagner et al[69], 2025 | Czech Republic | Prospective first-in-human observational study; n = 9 | Jejuno-ileostomy bipartition for obesity and type 2 diabetes | Successful magnet alignment and formation of patent jejuno-ileal anastomosis with spontaneous magnet expulsion. Clinical success: 9/9 (100%); technical success: 9/9 (100%) | No severe adverse events; minor events included influenza after discharge and transient hypoglycemia after magnet expulsion |
| Bhandari et al[70], 2026 | India, Chile | Prospective multicenter study; n = 14 | Jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass | Freedom from anastomotic adverse events within 30 days. Clinical success: 14/14 (100%); technical success: 14/14 (100%) | Procedure-related AEs: Bleeding, dysphagia, pulmonary embolism, diabetic ketoacidosis (n = 4); no device-related AEs |
| Machytka et al[57], 2017 | Czech Republic | Prospective single center study; n = 10 | Partial jejunal diversion | Total weight loss. Clinical success: 100%; technical success: 100% | No Serious, trocar-related gastric injury in one patient |
- Citation: Reddy RT, Bagrodia A, Mehta K, Vaithiyam V, Mohan SL, Sirohi N, Dalal A, Srivastava S, Sachdeva S. Magnetic compression anastomosis in gastrointestinal and biliary disease: Techniques and clinical applications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 121147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/121147.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121147