Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 121147
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121147
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121147
Table 2 Summary of clinical studies evaluating magnetic compression anastomosis for biliary conditions
| Ref. | Country | Design and patients | Indication | Main outcome | Adverse events and limitations |
| Jang et al[35], 2011 | South Korea | Retrospective observational study; n = 12 | Biliary anastomotic strictures after living donor liver transplantation | Successful recanalization of biliary anastomotic stricture after LDLT. Clinical success: 9/12 (75%); technical success: 10/12 (83.3%) | Mild cholangitis (n = 1); recurrence of anastomotic stricture (n = 1) |
| Jang et al[36], 2014 | South Korea | Retrospective case series; n = 7 | Recanalization of refractory benign biliary strictures | Successful recanalization of completely obstructed benign biliary strictures. Clinical success: 5/7 (71.4%); technical success: 5/7 (71.4%) | No MCA-related complications or restenosis reported |
| Ersoz et al[37], 2016 | Turkey | Pilot study/case series; n = 6 | Disconnected bile duct after living-donor liver transplantation | Biliary recanalization after magnetic compression anastomosis. Clinical success: 6/6 (100%); technical success: 6/6 (100%) | No procedure-related adverse events reported |
| Jang et al[2], 2017 | South Korea | Single-center retrospective cohort study; n = 39 | Completely obstructed benign biliary strictures | Successful recanalization and long-term patency of the biliary tract. Clinical success: 33/39 (84.6%); technical success: 35/39 (89.7%) | Mild cholangitis (n = 1); restenosis (n = 1); partial restenosis (n = 1) |
| Parlak et al[21], 2017 | Turkey | Prospective case series; n = 9 | Complete biliary obstruction after liver transplantation | Recanalization of complete duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis obstruction. Clinical success: 7/9 (77.8%); technical success: 7/9 (77.8%) | No procedure-related adverse events |
| Li et al[10], 2020 | China | Prospective single-center clinical study; n = 9 | Benign biliary strictures | Successful recanalization of benign biliary stricture with sustained duct patency. Clinical success: 9/9 (100%); technical success: 9/9 (100%) | Mild cholangitis (n = 1); biliary bleeding from PTBD tract (n = 1) |
| Ödemiş et al[12], 2022 | Turkey | Retrospective case series; n = 19 | Completely obstructed benign biliary strictures | Recanalization of completely obstructed benign biliary strictures with restoration of bile flow. Clinical success: 12/19 (63.2%); technical success: 19/21 procedures (90.5%) | Magnet entrapment (n = 3); magnet migration (n = 2); cholangitis (n = 1) |
| Chavan et al[38], 2024 | India | Case series; n = 3 | Post-cholecystectomy benign biliary stricture recanalization | Bile duct recanalization confirmed by cholangiography after magnet removal. Clinical success: 3/3 (100%); technical success: 3/3 (100%) | None reported |
| Jang et al[39], 2024 | South Korea | Retrospective cohort study; n = 10 | Complete biliary obstruction after cholecystectomy | Recanalization of complete biliary obstruction with creation of a fistulous tract. Clinical success: 8/10 (80%); technical success: 10/10 (100%) | No procedure-related adverse events; 2 patients developed stricture recurrence treated with repeat FCSEMS |
| Ünal et al[40], 2025 | Turkey | Retrospective single-center cohort study; n = 26 | Post-transplant biliary strictures (combined endoscopic-percutaneous approach) | Successful recanalization of completely obstructed post-transplant biliary anastomotic strictures with long-term patency. Clinical success: 24/26 (92.3%); technical success: 24/26 (92.3%) | Recurrent biliary stricture during follow-up (n = 6); no major procedure-related complications reported |
- Citation: Reddy RT, Bagrodia A, Mehta K, Vaithiyam V, Mohan SL, Sirohi N, Dalal A, Srivastava S, Sachdeva S. Magnetic compression anastomosis in gastrointestinal and biliary disease: Techniques and clinical applications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 121147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/121147.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121147