BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 120625
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120625
Table 7 Comparison of secondary observation indicators between two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
Item
Poor wound healing group (n = 22)
Good wound healing group (n = 93)
Test statistic
P value
Time to complete wound healing (days)28.6 ± 8.416.2 ± 4.3t = 7.89< 0.001
VAS pain scores
Postoperative day 36.2 ± 1.84.5 ± 1.6t = 4.23< 0.001
Postoperative day 74.9 ± 1.53.1 ± 1.2t = 5.67< 0.001
Postoperative day 143.4 ± 1.31.8 ± 0.9t = 6.12< 0.001
Wound scarringχ2 =12.430.002
Mild4 (18.2)52 (55.9)
Moderate12 (54.5)35 (37.6)
Obvious6 (27.3)6 (6.5)
Anti-tuberculosis treatment complianceχ2 = 5.640.018
Good (≥ 80%)12 (54.5)72 (77.4)
Fair (60%-79%)7 (31.8)16 (17.2)
Poor (< 60%)3 (13.6)5 (5.4)
Postoperative intra-abdominal infection rate8 (36.4)9 (9.7)χ2 = 11.670.001


Write to the Help Desk